Why I'm Getting Back with Quicksilver
3 June 2005
Filed under Mac, Technology, Text
All that it took was a Quicktime movie - the kind of productivity porn that I'm (ironically) wasting too much of my time on these days - and I was back to using Quicksilver from the prime Apple-Space position it occupied before Spotlight came along. Spotlight - perhaps because of the depth of its searches - is noticeably slower than Quicksilver, and really most useful for the power searches it's been built for. As an application launcher, it kind of sucks.
And here's something cool: I can develop software with the power of thought. Last night, I was thinking how annoying it was that I couldn't create a new text file from within the Finder - and this morning I wake up find this among my RSS feeds. Weeee.
Edit EntryCategories
- Art (5)
- Books (7)
- Business (19)
- Code (7)
- Design (30)
- Film and Television (9)
- Folio (12)
- Food (2)
- Football (11)
- I Am Alert (13)
- Language (20)
- Life (58)
- Mac (22)
- Melbourne (13)
- Music (14)
- Photography (4)
- Politics (32)
- Technology (41)
- The Interweb (47)
- The Media (10)
- Travel (9)
- Weather (7)
Views from the Floor
Khoi Vinh says:
One of the few but nontrivial number of low-level things that Windows does better than Mac OS X is allow the creation of new documents of any type from within the Windows Explorer. Document Palette does a slightly cooler job at this than Windows, but that feature really should have been built into Mac OS X to begin with.
Jeez, I'm kind of a killjoy now, huh? Sorry.
Peter says:
Like so many little apps I download, Quicksilver was an obsession for about three hours before being consigned to the "I-won't-bother-backing-this-up" bin. It's unfortunate, because pretty much everyone in the world has by now said how good it is.
I am inspired to reconnect with Quicksilver. I hope we will be very happy.
Comments are closed on this entry.